On two raw number tasks that have not yet been compared to a general population, your accuracy was 82.0% on a task called Magnitude Comparison, which measures your ability to judge at a glance which of two numbers is larger (a basic form of number sense). Your accuracy was 78.0% on Arithmetic Verification, which measures how quickly and accurately you can check whether a simple arithmetic fact (like 7+5=12) is correct (a measure of math fact fluency). Because these are raw task results without norms and are not percentiles, standard scores, or a below/average/above rating, these figures cannot be interpreted as a definite strength or difficulty. However, the relative pattern across the two tasks may hint that your basic number sense (judging which number is bigger) appears to be somewhat more accurate than your ability to quickly verify arithmetic facts. This could suggest that while your intuitive grasp of number size feels relatively smooth, the automatic recall or checking of math facts may be a more effortful process for you.

Your working memory scores fall solidly in the Average range, indicating that your ability to hold and manipulate information in mind is in line with most adults your age. On Digit Span, your performance was average overall, and the pattern of forward and backward scores did not show a significant discrepancy that would suggest a specific working memory weakness. On the N-Back task, which measures the ability to continuously update and monitor information in working memory, your score was also average. Research indicates that working memory is a core executive function that supports multi-step reasoning and mental arithmetic (Nezamoleslami, 2026). Your results show no evidence of difficulty in this domain.

Your results show a clear split in executive function abilities. On the Stroop Color-Word Test, your selective attention and inhibitory control are solidly average (Standard Score 108.3, 71st percentile), indicating you can effectively suppress an automatic response (reading) in favor of a controlled one (color naming). In contrast, your Trail Making Test performance is below average (Standard Score 74.1, 4th percentile), reflecting a well-defined area of difficulty in cognitive flexibility and set-shifting (the ability to switch between tasks or mental sets efficiently). The B-A difference on Trails isolates this executive component from basic processing speed, and the pattern suggests that shifting mental gears is disproportionately harder for you than processing speed alone would predict. Research indicates that such a discrepancy can signal executive dysfunction beyond simple slowing (Juhász, 2025).

Your processing speed scores are in the Average range, indicating that your ability to quickly and efficiently process visual information and respond is generally intact. On the Digit Symbol Substitution Test / Symbol Digit Modalities Test, which is a sensitive measure of processing speed, attention, and visual-motor coordination, your performance was solidly average. Similarly, your Simple Reaction Time, reflecting basic alertness and speed of response to a stimulus, was also average. These results suggest no significant slowing in your cognitive processing speed. Research indicates that digital assessment modes can yield comparable results to traditional methods when properly normed.

Your Matrix Reasoning score falls in the Average range (Standard Score 108.3, 71st percentile), indicating that your fluid reasoning and nonverbal abstract problem-solving abilities are solidly intact. This measure assesses your capacity to identify patterns, infer rules, and solve novel problems without relying on prior knowledge or language. Research supports that matrix reasoning tasks are relatively culture-fair and tap into general cognitive ability (Liao, 2026). Your performance suggests efficient reasoning with visual patterns, consistent with typical adult functioning.

Your performance on the Flanker task, which measures selective attention and the ability to filter out distracting information, fell in the Average range (Standard Score 100, 50th percentile). This indicates that your ability to focus on relevant information while ignoring irrelevant stimuli is on par with other adults your age. Research on attentional control in adults suggests that average performance on such tasks reflects intact conflict resolution and inhibitory control (Nezamoleslami, 2026).

Your Vocabulary score (Standard Score 75.6, 5th percentile) falls clearly in the below-average range, indicating a well-defined area of difficulty in word knowledge and verbal concept formation. This is a stable measure of crystallized verbal intelligence, and a low score relative to other abilities may reflect limited educational exposure or specific language-based difficulties. In contrast, your Verbal Fluency score (Standard Score 100.0, 50th percentile) is average, showing intact ability to generate words under phonemic and semantic constraints, which relies on executive search strategies and semantic memory stores (Macoir, 2025). The discrepancy between Vocabulary and Verbal Fluency suggests that while your word retrieval processes are efficient, your stored lexical knowledge is reduced.

Your cognitive profile shows a clear and consistent pattern of strengths in reasoning and executive control, alongside two well-defined areas of difficulty: processing speed under complex sequencing demands and vocabulary-based verbal knowledge. This pattern is not consistent with an attention/ADHD profile or a dyscalculia profile based on the normed data available.

Your Matrix Reasoning score (Standard Score 108.3, 71st percentile) is a genuine strength, indicating strong non-verbal abstract reasoning and fluid intelligence. You are able to identify patterns, solve novel problems, and grasp complex relationships without relying on prior knowledge. This is supported by your Stroop Color-Word Test score (Standard Score 108.3, 71st percentile), which shows excellent cognitive flexibility and the ability to inhibit a prepotent response (reading a word) in favor of a less automatic one (naming the ink color). Your Digit Span (Standard Score 102.5, 56th percentile) and N-Back (Standard Score 104.6, 62nd percentile) scores are solidly average, showing that your immediate attention, working memory, and ability to hold and update information in mind are intact. Your Verbal Fluency (Standard Score 100.0, 50th percentile) is average, meaning your ability to efficiently retrieve words from your mental lexicon under time pressure is unremarkable. Your Flanker Task (Standard Score 100.0, 50th percentile) and Simple Reaction Time (Standard Score 93.3, 33rd percentile) are also average, indicating no difficulties with basic selective attention or simple motor speed.

The most prominent area of difficulty is on the Trail Making Test (TMT), where your score (Standard Score 74.1, 4th percentile) is well below average. This test requires you to rapidly switch between sequencing numbers and letters (1-A-2-B-3-C...), demanding a combination of visual scanning, cognitive flexibility, and processing speed. This is a specific bottleneck in your cognitive profile. A second area of difficulty is on the Vocabulary test (Standard Score 75.6, 5th percentile), which is also below average. This measures your breadth of word knowledge and verbal concept formation. The contrast between your strong non-verbal reasoning (Matrix Reasoning) and your below-average vocabulary is a notable discrepancy, suggesting a specific weakness in crystallized verbal knowledge rather than a general intellectual difficulty.

Regarding numerical cognition, the two tasks administered (Magnitude Comparison and Arithmetic Verification) are raw-score-only measures. Your accuracy was 82% and 78% respectively. Because these are not normed, they cannot be interpreted as a percentile or clinical finding. They provide preliminary task data only and do not support any conclusion about a dyscalculia pattern. Similarly, the pattern of attention and inhibition scores does not meet the threshold for an attention/ADHD profile. While the TMT score is below average, it is a single measure of complex sequencing and cognitive flexibility, not a core measure of sustained attention or response inhibition. Your average scores on the Stroop, Flanker, Digit Span, and N-Back tasks all argue against a consistent pattern of attentional or inhibitory deficits.

Your screening results show two areas that scored below average: a task involving cognitive flexibility and visual scanning (Trail Making Test, 4th percentile) and a vocabulary measure (5th percentile). These are isolated findings from a brief screening battery, not a comprehensive evaluation. If you notice that these patterns (such as difficulty shifting attention between tasks or occasional word-finding challenges) match experiences in your daily life, discussing these results with a healthcare professional may be worth considering. A primary care physician can review the results and, if appropriate, provide a referral to a clinical neuropsychologist for a more thorough assessment. A neuropsychologist can administer a full battery of tests to clarify the nature and extent of any cognitive difficulties and offer personalized guidance. Because this is a screening, these results do not point toward any specific condition; they simply highlight general cognitive areas that may benefit from further exploration.

For the cognitive flexibility and visual scanning difficulty reflected in the Trail Making Test score, practical strategies can help manage everyday situations that require shifting attention. When switching between tasks (such as moving from a work project to answering emails), try using a timer or a visual cue (e.g., a sticky note on your monitor) to signal the transition. Apps like Focus Booster or Pomodone can structure work into focused intervals with short breaks, reducing the cognitive load of task-switching. For vocabulary challenges, keep a small notebook or use a notes app (e.g., Evernote, Google Keep) to jot down words you encounter and want to remember. When speaking, if a word feels elusive, pause briefly and describe the concept instead; this reduces pressure and often helps the word surface. In a workplace setting, consider requesting accommodations such as written instructions for multi-step tasks or permission to use a digital dictionary during meetings. These strategies are compensatory tools, not proof of a condition, and can be adjusted to fit your routine.