We trained a specialized model on 220 neuropsychology papers and 11 normative databases to do one job: interpret the results from our 26-test battery. The reports it generates are scored deterministically, grounded in published research, and designed to be shared with clinicians.
General-purpose AI models have no access to normative tables, no concept of what "typical" means for a 34-year-old vs. a 60-year-old, and no ability to identify cross-domain cognitive patterns. They sound confident. They also hallucinate citations. We needed something better, so we built it.
| Feature | ChatGPT / General AI | Neuropsych.io Report |
|---|---|---|
| Normative comparison | ✗ Guesses what "normal" means | ✓ Compares to published norms by age and gender (N=200-2,200 per test) |
| Standard scores | ✗ Can't compute - no normative tables | ✓ Standard Score (M=100, SD=15), percentile, classification band |
| Cross-domain pattern analysis | ~ Describes each score separately | ✓ Identifies patterns across domains (e.g., low numerical cognition + intact reasoning = dyscalculia profile) |
| Dyscalculia screening | ✗ No validated framework | ✓ MMR framework - separates dyscalculia from math developmental delay |
| Research citations | ✗ Hallucinated or generic references | ✓ Real papers from 220-paper corpus, cited per section |
| Consistency | ✗ Different answer each time | ✓ Deterministic scoring + structured generation = reproducible reports |
| Validity indicators | ✗ Takes all scores at face value | ✓ Flags potentially invalid results (distraction, misunderstanding) |
| Everyday examples | ~ Generic descriptions | ✓ "You may struggle to hold a phone number while dialing" - specific to your profile |
| Actionable recommendations | ~ Vague suggestions | ✓ Specific professionals to see, accommodations to request, strategies to try |
| Shareable with clinician | ✗ Chat transcript - not a clinical document | ✓ Formatted PDF with methodology, disclaimers, and citations |
| Privacy | ✗ Your health data sent to OpenAI/Google servers | ✓ Generated on dedicated infrastructure - your data stays private |
| Cost | ~ 20 $ | ✓ One-time 14,99 € per report |
Take the tests and see your scores at no cost. If you want the full AI-generated interpretation with pattern analysis, citations, and recommendations, that's the report.
Try select tests from each cognitive domain. See where you stand before unlocking the full picture.
Full cognitive profile with interpretation, pattern analysis, screening indicators, and next steps. Every claim cites real research.
The system separates math from language on purpose. Numbers are never generated by AI. Prose is never generated without research context. Every layer has a specific job.
All numbers in your report come from math, not from a language model. Raw scores are converted to standard scores (M=100, SD=15) and percentiles using published normative tables, stratified by age and gender. The AI never computes a number. Sources include Wechsler (WAIS-V), Tombaugh (Trail Making), Strauss, Sherman & Spreen, and the NEURONORMA project for Spanish populations.
Before writing each section of your report, the engine searches a curated corpus of 220 research papers (468 indexed passages) to find interpretation guidelines, normative context, and clinical precedent relevant to your specific scores. The model writes with the research in front of it, not from memory.
Report prose is generated by a model fine-tuned for neuropsychological interpretation. It writes section by section, each with its own research context, so that every paragraph has relevant citations and every claim traces back to published literature. The model is hosted on dedicated hardware; your data never touches third-party AI services.
This is the part that makes the report more than a score-by-score summary. The engine compares your results across all seven cognitive domains to find clinically meaningful patterns. Low numerical cognition with intact reasoning suggests a different profile than low scores across the board. The system uses the NumberSenseMMR framework to distinguish dyscalculia from general math difficulty.
Before a report reaches you, automated checks verify that scores are consistent, citations are real, no diagnostic language slipped through, and disclaimers are present. Validity indicators flag potentially unreliable results caused by distraction, misunderstanding, or testing conditions.
Synthetic profile: 34-year-old male, below-average working memory, average reasoning, above-average processing speed. Real scores, real normative comparison, real pattern detection.
"The profile reveals a distinct dissociation between processing speed and working memory capacity. While the 'engine' runs fast - DSST at the 95th percentile - the ability to hold and manipulate information is significantly impaired. This creates a frustrating paradox where the individual appears quick-witted but fails to retain the necessary details to execute complex plans."
Reference: Bulthé et al. (2019). Multi-method brain imaging reveals impaired representations of number as well as altered connectivity in adults with dyscalculia.
The cognitive assessment is free. Take the tests, explore your scores, and see if the report adds value for you. 14,99 € per report, no subscription.
Start the assessment →